The multimedia version, the sites that you should go to and the ones that you should skip.
The multimedia version, the sites that you should go to and the ones that you should skip.
This semester I have spent my time analyzing the content, the website and the social media for The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post was started by Arianna Huffington in 2005. The website publishes blogs and stories – some from their staff writers and some from other publications. There are many different types of stories that appear on the Huffington Post website – everything from current events, politics, entertainment and more.
There are many highlights, as well as some lowlights for this website. While they are a well established news organization and come up in conversation, blog posts and Google searches, the Huffington Post has not become my go to for news of pretty much any nature.
Some highlights are:
Some lowlights are:
While the Huffington Post is a major news outlet – at least in some ways – it is not one that I will rely on for my news going forward. They have some positive aspects (especially the blogs) that I will miss however not enough to seek out. In order to keep my readership, they will have to turn down the antics and start straight forward reporting sans flashy headlines.
Charles Sennott, a co-founder of The GroundTruth Project, came to Boston University Wednesday to talk to students and faculty about his project called GroundTruth as well as the future of journalism for young journalists. Check out my tweets from the event below or on Twitter (@chloebruning).
https://storify.com/cbruning/charles-sennott-speaks-about-youth-in-journalism
Huffington Post has a snapchat that they update regularly. I started following it on Snapchat after last week’s class discussion. They update the snap story multiple times a day resulting in a few minute story by the end of the day.
Last weekend, the Huffington Post covered the SXSW (South by Southwest) Festival in Texas. SXSW is a music, film and art festival in Austin, Texas. Huffington Post was there covering the event and posted many snaps of musicians performing, festival goers dancing, festival food and many other things. The festival lasted all weekend, so by the end of the weekend the snapchat story was many minutes long – which is impressive because at most the longest clip was 10 seconds long.
Since the SXSW festival ended, Huffington Post has continued to post to its snapchat story, however these videos have been less interesting and sort of a strange aspect of the Huffington Post. The videos are just random reporters talking to the camera about pretty random things. The snapchat videos don’t relate to other content published on their website. These videos would make more sense, and be more cohesive with the Huffington Post, if the reporters in the videos were promoting their piece that is already published online.
Snapchat is a powerful and new tool that is open to reporters, however I believe that the Huffington Post missed the mark on this one. It is a rather random selection of videos on the website. It would be better if the videos that they show on Snapchat relates back to content that is already on their website. The original reporting on the Snapchat video doesn’t make much sense in terms of the Huffington Post. The social media editors for the Huffington Post should take a serious look at how Snapchat is working for their site.
For this video assignment I made a video about BU’s independent student newspaper, The Daily Free Press. We publish content five days a week online and one day a week in print. We write about everything from city and campus news to the latest goings on on the BU sports fields, concert reviews and more.
You can find us online at: dailyfreepress.com or pick up our print edition around campus every Thursday.
While the Huffington Post had lots of articles about the Oscars, they didn’t mention Spotlight specifically except to say that it won Best Picture. Their Oscar coverage focused on the controversies – outside of the winners and losers of the awards. They focused on Chris Rock’s opening monologue and Tina Fey’s comments about all the “Bulls**T” she saw while at the Oscars which she talked about on the Howard Stern show Monday morning.
For a movie about journalism – and arguably the best journalism movie since “All the President’s Men” – the HuffPo was lacking in coverage. They are much more inclined to talk about the drama – justified or not – than talk about the actual award show itself.
The HuffPo has more fluff articles than anything else. They write about how much Lady Gaga’s earrings cost, about cookies that are replicas of great Oscar dresses and how Stallone’s brother thought he should’ve won for Creed. Another thing that the HuffPo talked about a lot was Leo DiCaprio and his Oscar and lack of previous Oscar wins.
Generally, the Huffington Post does a good job with multimedia incorporated into their stories. Most stories have a bunch of photos and links in the text as well as videos included in the post. The videos, however, are not usually created by the Huffington Post, instead they are outside videos that are linked into the story.
For example in a story about the upcoming Oscars this weekend they linked the trailers to all the movies they were talking about in the article. Obviously, Huffington Post didn’t create the trailers but it was nice to be able to read about the movie and what the Huffington Post thought about the movie and then watch the trailer – especially if it was a movie that I had never heard of before. So while maybe the Huffington Post isn’t creating the videos, they are using the myriad of videos that already populate the internet to further their posts.
An example of a post that used video that the Huffington Post created on their website is a story about Black Lives Matter protestors at a Hillary Clinton rally. They could’ve done a better job creating the video because it was rather straight forward but it did provide the reader of the story with an example of what was actually happening at the Clinton rally.
As the whole world knows by now, Justice Antonin Scalia died in Texas over the weekend. Twitter, Facebook and every news source in the world were talking about it but not the way you might think following a high profile death. Usually after someone who holds a position of power dies they are remembered with multiple articles about their accomplishments, their attributes and various other stories about how they will be missed.
Scalia’s death prompted a different reaction. In the same breath as Supreme Court Justice died today, people were immediately talking about who is going to fill the vacancy, will Obama appoint the new justice or will he leave the appointment to the next person to take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
The Huffington Post was one of the news outlets that focused on the future of the Supreme Court instead of the life of Scalia. The days that followed the only topic they talked about was the issue over Senate Republicans who say they will not put through any of Obama’s choices.
On Wednesday night, five days after Scalia died, the main headline on the Huffington Post website is: “CRACK GOP’s United Front Crumbles … Another Senator Strays From Party Line … White House Attack Plan: Shame ‘Em! …”
The article talks about how even though Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell urged Obama not to nominate a new justice because the Senate will not affirm his choice – whoever it is – some Senators did not follow McConnell’s lead and said that they will affirm Obama’s choice depending on who it is.
All in all, I found it really interesting that Republicans and Democrats both had widely different reactions but neither of them was talking about how great Scalia was in life. Democrats were rejoicing over his death. Republicans were fretting over who Obama would chose and how the Republicans could possibly stop a candidate from going through.
Even though I didn’t agree with Scalia’s ideologies or decisions I still found it disconcerting that the country didn’t mourn his death at all. It speaks volumes about our country’s political system as a whole right now – the fact that more people were concerned about the future of our Supreme Court’s ideological choices than the death of someone who has dedicated his life to the highest court in the United States and has held his position since Reagan was in the Oval.
I spent this week, traveling around the city of Boston for a scavenger hunt on Twitter for my multimedia journalism class. Check out what I found below!
https://storify.com/cbruning/jo304-twitter-scavenger-hunt.html
Every major news site covered the New Hampshire primaries Tuesday. Some sites, however, covered the issue in different ways. The Boston Globe had a results page that refreshed itself every 15 seconds, the Associated PressAssociated Press and the New York Times sent out push notifications to my phone and my computer as soon as the winners for both the Republican and Democratic parties had been determined.
The Huffington Post however was a bit more dramatic in their coverage. Around 2pm on Tuesday – well before the polls closed, the main headline on the HuffPo website was “WHO WILL SURVIVE? Primary Day in New Hampshire…Field Set To Shrink… State Known For Surprises … HUFFPOLLSTER: Independents Up For Grabs … Early Wins for Kasich, Sanders … Is the New Hampshire Primary Dead? …” The headline accompanied a photo collage of six republican candidates (Christie, Rubio, Bush, Cruz, Trump and Kasich). Around 7pm on Tuesday, the headline was pretty much the same but with added flair about how Rubio is a robot and the “question isn’t whether Rubio is a robot – it’s who programmed him…” Clinton and Sanders were also added to the six photos that were already in the collage.
Throughout the day, they were also updating their political themed blogs, which appeared on the left hand side of the website underneath their ridiculously dramatic headline. HuffPost staff writers as well as guest bloggers like Richard North Patterson, a novelist, a producer of HuffPost Live and a fellow of Campaign for America’s Future and a bunch of other people, wrote the headlines. Their headlines were less dramatic than the main headlines on the page – like “Is Clinton Bought By Wall Street? There Is A Test For That,” and “Why the Pundits Don’t See the Revolution Coming … Again.”
Once the results were in, in the early evening, the dramatic headlines returned. The main headline on the page was in all capital leaders and red font. The main headline read, “NH GOES RACIST SEXIST XENOPHOBIC.” The drama returned.
The Huffington Post also has a page that is dedicated to 2016 election results. On the page they have all the democratic and republican candidates, the number of delegates each candidate has and the national
poll information. They also have the information for each upcoming primary. They tell you when the election is taking place, which party the election is for and the number of delegates at stake in the primary.
It will be interesting to see how the Huffington Post continues to cover the upcoming elections through the November general.
Cultivating crazy since 2015
a multimedia storyteller
New England. Sports. Journalism
Multimedia Journalist & Storyteller
JO304 Blog for assignments and related material.
A Collection of This and That
Your source for all things JO304
Online Journalism
online with a deadline
To better know and analyze world news
will write / record / photograph for food.
Blog
Sam's Blog